<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Affordable Green Design Have to Be So Modern When I WANT TRADITIONAL!?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/does-affordable-green-design-have-to-be-so-modern-when-i-want-traditional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/does-affordable-green-design-have-to-be-so-modern-when-i-want-traditional/</link>
	<description>A Green Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/does-affordable-green-design-have-to-be-so-modern-when-i-want-traditional/#comment-4174</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=340#comment-4174</guid>
		<description>Modern and traditional can co-exist easily.  Yet 95% of our population wants to live in a traditional home.  The trouble, as I see it, is that most housing is poorly designed.  It is neither good modern nor good traditional.  Its just plain crap.

Very few homes should be "one offs" individually designed for a specific client.  What I think we need are better mass market plans and better plan books.  The homes you see in your typical supermarket plan book are just awful.  It may be that this is all the consuming public sees so many of them think that's what they should be asking for. 

Most architects have abdicated that segment of the market.  But they would do well to start doing great plans for the masses.

Best.
Gregory M. Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern and traditional can co-exist easily.  Yet 95% of our population wants to live in a traditional home.  The trouble, as I see it, is that most housing is poorly designed.  It is neither good modern nor good traditional.  Its just plain crap.</p>
<p>Very few homes should be &#8220;one offs&#8221; individually designed for a specific client.  What I think we need are better mass market plans and better plan books.  The homes you see in your typical supermarket plan book are just awful.  It may be that this is all the consuming public sees so many of them think that&#8217;s what they should be asking for. </p>
<p>Most architects have abdicated that segment of the market.  But they would do well to start doing great plans for the masses.</p>
<p>Best.<br />
Gregory M. Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny M.</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/does-affordable-green-design-have-to-be-so-modern-when-i-want-traditional/#comment-4164</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=340#comment-4164</guid>
		<description>Ludwig Meis Van der Rohe
Tadao Ando
Leandro Locsin

These architects have shown that 'traditional' decorative elements aren't required to 'beautify' a building. Let those decorative elements live in the past, in old world mansions, museums &#38; themed hotels. 

I'd rather see buildings that have balance, symmetry, scale and texture (as naturally exuded by its building materials); performing its function as a machine for man to live in.
All too often the efficiency of the building takes a backseat to cost &#38; aesthetics; and these designers have the gall to call themselves architects. When clearly they are just sculptors who were able to con a patron into having their sculpture funded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ludwig Meis Van der Rohe<br />
Tadao Ando<br />
Leandro Locsin</p>
<p>These architects have shown that &#8216;traditional&#8217; decorative elements aren&#8217;t required to &#8216;beautify&#8217; a building. Let those decorative elements live in the past, in old world mansions, museums &amp; themed hotels. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather see buildings that have balance, symmetry, scale and texture (as naturally exuded by its building materials); performing its function as a machine for man to live in.<br />
All too often the efficiency of the building takes a backseat to cost &amp; aesthetics; and these designers have the gall to call themselves architects. When clearly they are just sculptors who were able to con a patron into having their sculpture funded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/does-affordable-green-design-have-to-be-so-modern-when-i-want-traditional/#comment-4160</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=340#comment-4160</guid>
		<description>Thank you - I just posted about this and was searching to find others in my field who had the same viewpoint and came across your post. I've linked to it in my blog.

Regards,
Kelly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you - I just posted about this and was searching to find others in my field who had the same viewpoint and came across your post. I&#8217;ve linked to it in my blog.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Kelly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
