<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ThinkDwell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog</link>
	<description>A Green Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Q: What Are SIPs / Are They Green? by chris kavala</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/q-what-are-sips-are-they-green/#comment-5386</link>
		<dc:creator>chris kavala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=86#comment-5386</guid>
		<description>steel sip videos and pics

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.channel&#38;channelID=468602158</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steel sip videos and pics</p>
<p><a href="http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.channel&amp;channelID=468602158" rel="nofollow">http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.channel&amp;channelID=468602158</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q: Wood Frame vs. Straw Bale Home Construction: Which is More Sustainable? by Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/q-wood-frame-vs-straw-bale-which-is-more-sustainable/#comment-5044</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=61#comment-5044</guid>
		<description>There is a lot of inaccurate information about the R-value of straw-bale walls. Like statements of an R-value of 45.

Oakridge National Laboratories did two tests, the first was faulty so a second was done using a wall that "Several nationally known straw-bale home builders oversaw construction of the walls and the testing."

The testing showed an overall rating of 1.45 per inch or R-27.5 for a 19 inch wall.

The testing and results can be found at this link
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/roofs+walls/AWT/HotboxTest/Hybrid/StrawBale/index.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of inaccurate information about the R-value of straw-bale walls. Like statements of an R-value of 45.</p>
<p>Oakridge National Laboratories did two tests, the first was faulty so a second was done using a wall that &#8220;Several nationally known straw-bale home builders oversaw construction of the walls and the testing.&#8221;</p>
<p>The testing showed an overall rating of 1.45 per inch or R-27.5 for a 19 inch wall.</p>
<p>The testing and results can be found at this link<br />
<a href="http://www.ornl.gov/sci/roofs+walls/AWT/HotboxTest/Hybrid/StrawBale/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ornl.gov/sci/roofs+walls/AWT/HotboxTest/Hybrid/StrawBale/index.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Affordable Green Design Have to Be So Modern When I WANT TRADITIONAL!? by Gregory Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/does-affordable-green-design-have-to-be-so-modern-when-i-want-traditional/#comment-4174</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=340#comment-4174</guid>
		<description>Modern and traditional can co-exist easily.  Yet 95% of our population wants to live in a traditional home.  The trouble, as I see it, is that most housing is poorly designed.  It is neither good modern nor good traditional.  Its just plain crap.

Very few homes should be "one offs" individually designed for a specific client.  What I think we need are better mass market plans and better plan books.  The homes you see in your typical supermarket plan book are just awful.  It may be that this is all the consuming public sees so many of them think that's what they should be asking for. 

Most architects have abdicated that segment of the market.  But they would do well to start doing great plans for the masses.

Best.
Gregory M. Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern and traditional can co-exist easily.  Yet 95% of our population wants to live in a traditional home.  The trouble, as I see it, is that most housing is poorly designed.  It is neither good modern nor good traditional.  Its just plain crap.</p>
<p>Very few homes should be &#8220;one offs&#8221; individually designed for a specific client.  What I think we need are better mass market plans and better plan books.  The homes you see in your typical supermarket plan book are just awful.  It may be that this is all the consuming public sees so many of them think that&#8217;s what they should be asking for. </p>
<p>Most architects have abdicated that segment of the market.  But they would do well to start doing great plans for the masses.</p>
<p>Best.<br />
Gregory M. Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Affordable Green Design Have to Be So Modern When I WANT TRADITIONAL!? by Danny M.</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/does-affordable-green-design-have-to-be-so-modern-when-i-want-traditional/#comment-4164</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=340#comment-4164</guid>
		<description>Ludwig Meis Van der Rohe
Tadao Ando
Leandro Locsin

These architects have shown that 'traditional' decorative elements aren't required to 'beautify' a building. Let those decorative elements live in the past, in old world mansions, museums &#38; themed hotels. 

I'd rather see buildings that have balance, symmetry, scale and texture (as naturally exuded by its building materials); performing its function as a machine for man to live in.
All too often the efficiency of the building takes a backseat to cost &#38; aesthetics; and these designers have the gall to call themselves architects. When clearly they are just sculptors who were able to con a patron into having their sculpture funded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ludwig Meis Van der Rohe<br />
Tadao Ando<br />
Leandro Locsin</p>
<p>These architects have shown that &#8216;traditional&#8217; decorative elements aren&#8217;t required to &#8216;beautify&#8217; a building. Let those decorative elements live in the past, in old world mansions, museums &amp; themed hotels. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather see buildings that have balance, symmetry, scale and texture (as naturally exuded by its building materials); performing its function as a machine for man to live in.<br />
All too often the efficiency of the building takes a backseat to cost &amp; aesthetics; and these designers have the gall to call themselves architects. When clearly they are just sculptors who were able to con a patron into having their sculpture funded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Affordable Green Design Have to Be So Modern When I WANT TRADITIONAL!? by Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/does-affordable-green-design-have-to-be-so-modern-when-i-want-traditional/#comment-4160</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=340#comment-4160</guid>
		<description>Thank you - I just posted about this and was searching to find others in my field who had the same viewpoint and came across your post. I've linked to it in my blog.

Regards,
Kelly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you - I just posted about this and was searching to find others in my field who had the same viewpoint and came across your post. I&#8217;ve linked to it in my blog.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Kelly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More MPG by Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/more-mpg/#comment-4140</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=21#comment-4140</guid>
		<description>thats a mercedes benz slr mclaren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats a mercedes benz slr mclaren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q: What Are SIPs / Are They Green? by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/q-what-are-sips-are-they-green/#comment-2653</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=86#comment-2653</guid>
		<description>I think there are a lot of benefits to SIPs but I recently bid a SIPs project and the cost was nearly three times that of conventional framing. With proper framing and proper insulation the same R-Values can be achieved.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are a lot of benefits to SIPs but I recently bid a SIPs project and the cost was nearly three times that of conventional framing. With proper framing and proper insulation the same R-Values can be achieved.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Home Is Like A Tomato by Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/a-home-is-like-a-tomato/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=301#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>Tax law, business financing and land costs continue to be motivators for increased house size in my realm of experience.  

I live in a region with high-income families who take on  larger mortgages (larger houses) for the larger interest deduction, business owners who were advised by their banks to buy larger homes in order to build more home equity to use as collateral to finance business expansion.  Further, higher land costs encourage construction of more costly (larger) homes proportional to the value of the lot.  The economics of a modest home on an expensive lot don't work.

The drop in home values has temporarily stifled some of this motivation, but this may be a good time for another discussion about limitations on the mortgage deduction, as an economic motivator to build smaller more efficient homes proportional to the need.  

Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tax law, business financing and land costs continue to be motivators for increased house size in my realm of experience.  </p>
<p>I live in a region with high-income families who take on  larger mortgages (larger houses) for the larger interest deduction, business owners who were advised by their banks to buy larger homes in order to build more home equity to use as collateral to finance business expansion.  Further, higher land costs encourage construction of more costly (larger) homes proportional to the value of the lot.  The economics of a modest home on an expensive lot don&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>The drop in home values has temporarily stifled some of this motivation, but this may be a good time for another discussion about limitations on the mortgage deduction, as an economic motivator to build smaller more efficient homes proportional to the need.  </p>
<p>Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tip Tank - a water conservation game for kids (and adults) by Park Howell</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/tip-tank-a-water-conservation-game-for-kids-and-adults/#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Park Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=37#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>I just found this blog post on Google this morning, and was so happy you liked the game. As the creator of the Water - Use It Wisely campaign and the "Tip Tank" game, I'm always gratified to see people like you sharing your experience with the water conservation game. Thanks so much for including it in your blog, and I invite you to joine my green marketing conversation at http://parkhowell.com/.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found this blog post on Google this morning, and was so happy you liked the game. As the creator of the Water - Use It Wisely campaign and the &#8220;Tip Tank&#8221; game, I&#8217;m always gratified to see people like you sharing your experience with the water conservation game. Thanks so much for including it in your blog, and I invite you to joine my green marketing conversation at <a href="http://parkhowell.com/" rel="nofollow">http://parkhowell.com/</a>.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q: How Much Does a Green Home Cost? by Green Home Plans</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/q-how-much-does-a-green-home-cost/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Home Plans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkdwell.com/blog/?p=65#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>Even though green homes are typically a little more costly than traditional homes, but it's also important to remember that in the long run your costs associated with a greener home will be much less, so you will probably save a substantial amount of money.

Great article, a lot of useful information.

-Timothy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though green homes are typically a little more costly than traditional homes, but it&#8217;s also important to remember that in the long run your costs associated with a greener home will be much less, so you will probably save a substantial amount of money.</p>
<p>Great article, a lot of useful information.</p>
<p>-Timothy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
