Research suggests that observing the speed limit not only keeps roads safe: it’s helping you save on gas! The US Government’s website www.fueleconomy.gov states that fuel efficiency decreases rapidly after 60 mph. For every 5 mph over 60 you drive, it’s like paying an additional $0.30 for gasoline. For all those commuters bombing down the highway at 80 mph, that’s like paying $4.45 instead of $4.15. At 90 mph, you’re not only breaking the law, you’re breaking your bank at a whopping $4.75 per gallon. SUVs going 90… I don’t even want to get into it.

Moral of the story is, lay off the gas pedal and learn to coast when you can. When your RPMs are up, your fuel usage is up. Watch that little magic meter wand! It’s there for a reason. And one other thing, when you press the break, you lose momentum and waste fuel, so learn to slow down naturally over a longer distance.

Good luck and drive conservatively!

If you are renovating your home and are replacing things like cabinets, fixtures, windows, appliances, or pretty much anything that still works… please look into recycling these valuable items. All your donations are tax-deductible and will help someone else looking to renovate on a tight budget who wants to choose a more sustainable route as well. Learn more about how you can donate your items at www.greengoat.org. On the flip side of things, maybe you might want to check out GreenGoat’s website to see if they have items you can use in your renovation.

Stay Green and enjoy this beautiful summer day!

I am going to openly admit, I had a great time playing this fish tank match-the-blocks-to-fill-the-tank game. The tips for water conservation that go along with each block image are really interesting and helpful. For example, before I played Tip Tank, I didn’t know that you could save 600 gallons of water by making sure your laundry loads are full each time you put a load through the washer. 600 gallons! Introduce your kids (or yourself…) and learn all about water conservation efforts you can implement at home.

Having been a Bostonian for the past six years, and a native Massachusetts resident for life, I cannot help but notice the increase of people wearing green in the past few weeks. One group of teenagers went careening through an intersection waving their hats and shouting, “Go Celtics!” to the people waiting to cross the street and beeping their horn. People standing nearby cheered and pumped their fists in the air. Beyond the Celtics winning the NBA Championship, there is another green wave hitting the streets. We are all aware that the way we live effects how green we are. What Americans are only now beginning to seriously contemplate is that where we live effects how green we are.

In Los Angeles, where I’m sure green shirts and hats are banned for at least another few months, a green monsoon is ready to break through the skies. Maybe I should say, ‘Especially in LA’, where people are no stranger to the frequent brown-outs or occasional black-outs as an effect of over-consumption of energy. The dependency upon cars is also astounding in this city. The freeways stretch from the suburbs into the center of the city, meeting in a messy knot of overlapping off-ramps. The reason for the need for automobiles is simple: LA was built with the idea that you could drive in and out of the city and park at each building. Each building is surrounded by parking lots. The density of the city is greatly affected by the fact that each single building has a huge buffer for parking around it. Because buildings are so far apart, it is not feasible to walk or bike around. Walking across fields of asphalt in 90 + degree weather is like trying to exercise in a sauna. The population of LA has occupied an area many times larger than it should, and as a result, is working overtime to cure symptoms like 3 hour commutes to work… each way.

One way we can choose to greatly reduce our carbon footprint is to assess our daily commuting patterns and amount of land we consume. Studies have shown that people living in the city drive less than people who live in the suburbs. What’s even more interesting is that the more near the center of the city one lives, the less they drive. When I am visiting my parents, we drive to grocery store, the video rental store, restaurants, to get coffee, etc. It is not feasible to walk to any of those locations because it would take over an hour (and over 2 in some cases) to walk there and back. When I am at home, I walk to all of those locations with an occasional car trip to a superstore. The truth is that people who live far from the center of a city take an average of four times more car trips than those that live in the city. Their carbon footprint is also up to five times greater.

If you live in the… you produce use an average of this many BTUs/yr…

Suburbs 200-250

Suburbs with green living standards 150

Urban area 100

Urban area with green living standards 50

BTUs are British Thermal Units is a unit of energy used in the power, steam generation, and heating and air conditioning industries.

These differences are mostly due to the typical dwelling type of suburban and urban dwellers: the single-family detached home of the suburbs vs. the apartment. While single-families have to fend for themselves when it comes to heating and cooling, some of that effort is shared in a large apartment building, where hot air from the first floor can rise to help heat the above stories. The square footage of homes in the city are smaller per person, too, allowing the amount of energy used to heat and cool the space a person occupies to be substantially less than in the suburbs.

Not all hope is lost. In the past decade, land consumption has gone down 50%. Even still, the amount of land per person in the suburbs is far greater than in the city. One city person’s lifestyle effects only a small fraction of the land a suburban person effects.

All the while, American’s health and diet issues become of greater importance. The urban community sees far more activities like biking and walking to get to and from their daily destinations. As our recreational and mandatory activities become far more sedentary (watching television, working at a computer) we should reassess the situations we put ourselves in. If it is easier to walk to the grocery than drive and fight for parking on the street, we are more likely to choose to walk. If it is impossible to walk or just as easy to drive, we are more likely to choose to drive, based on our processes of finding the path of least resistance. But city living is not only about being forced to walk places. It is becoming more and more each day about enjoying the stroll through a nicely lit, café lined street in the evening, meeting people, community events and gatherings. Once cities were a great place to live… then they weren’t (industrial revolution)… but they are once again returning to the ways of the past: a strong sense of community with street-life culture that promotes a sustainable way of life.

The type of model LA followed when undergoing rapid development did not consider the walkability of the city. Heck, LA had only 3530 people in 1850 and in 158 years grew to a population of 1 million! I’m not sure growth like that could have been anticipated. Today, only 11% of LA commuters use public transit, in comparison to 53% in NYC. When buildings become strictly for one use (such as office, commercial, residential) they put a stress on the surrounding area to travel to get to it. By incorporating multi-use buildings, people can live, work and play in the same area. Our world that has become one that embraces traveling for work, vacations, weekend trips, family visits or even a night out on the town is becoming one that actually discourages the need to go the distance for such things. Cities need to review their structure and plan for better transportation options and revitalization/densification of certain areas in need of a cultural, social, and economic boost. The same methods can and should be applied to towns, even small ones. Are you involved in your town committies that review these options? If you can think of one part of town that has the potential to do more, maybe bringing street life back with multi-use facilities and safely lit sidewalks could do more than you hoped: revitalizing burnt-out economies and cutting neighborhood carbon footprints.

One of my friends has been involved in my business from day one. He has been thinking more green and making choices to live more sustainably ever since. He just let me know that he is thinking about buying a Toyota Prius because it gets around 48/45 mpg.

That makes me a happy camper.

He always jokes that I am turning him into a tree hugger. I kind of think of him (and I think he thinks of himself) as a ‘manly’ man, one who would be embarrassed to be known as a ‘tree hugger’. The kind that would be feel more justified driving a gas-guzzling Hummer or something else with a big horses. Apparently, his new car choice touches on a new topic. Monetary incentives help us go green. A Prius will save him around $1,000/year on fuel. Now that is making moves in the right direction. And I can claim victory for turning him into a ‘tree hugger’.

While shopping a local book store the other day, he picked up a great book for me that I wanted to share. It’s called Go Green, Live Rich, by David Bach with Hillary Rosner, and Amazon has used copies available for under $6.

It exemplifies many ways you can live more green and save lots of money by doing so. It even gives rough dollar amount savings. For example; you save about $215 per year by choosing an alternate mode of transportation once a week for your commute. Factor in the rising price of gas and you’re up to $300 by next year… I’m just guessing, but I don’t think I’m too far off. If everyone in the US switched to public transit once a week, we’d be reducing US carbon emissions by 149 million tons! If one driver in your house switched to public transportation full time, you’d be reducing your household’s carbon footprint by roughly 30%! Here’s one for the books: 40% of all car trips taken in the US are less than two miles. How easy would it be to bike that? And it doubles as exercise.